Atmospheric technologies used to manipulate earth’s environment is geoengineering. On face, it is proposed to mimic the temporary planetary cooling effects of a large volcanic eruption. The 1991 Mount Pinatubo eruption in the Philippines would be an example of the scale of exhaust into the atmosphere the engineers talk about achieving. Geoengineering tech has been reported for decades. It is mainstream now. If contemporary reports are sewn together, some glaring contradictions stand out in my view. It is right now in the news that an estimated 26 million tons of dust has blown up into the atmosphere from dry landscapes. This dust is scientifically estimated to be hiding the real nature of earth’s climate change by reflecting some of the sun’s rays back into space. That’s exactly what the solar radiation management geoengineering plan is designed to do. Exactly. If governments are studying the possibility of deploying atmospheric geoengineering, what exactly are they studying? What gives? Sure seems like broken logic to add more reflective elements to the sky if all it’s going to do is mask a supposedly real problem. Geoengineering is also always sighted as being controversial for a variety of reasons. It can’t be localized and the elements have pollution effects all the way down to, and into, the ground. So given the dust and danger components now in the news, what else factors into an effective world view regarding geoengineering? Damning evidence if you ask me.
Micro-particle pollution is everywhere. On every continent. On every mountain. In every drop of rain. Inside the organs and tissues of people, and I’d assume all life. It’s in the soil and air. It is everywhere. The scale, scope, and prediction of the geoengineering fallout is upon us. In spite of the fact that we live in a world in which denial is an art form, the ubiquity of world wide pollution cannot help but get noticed. This notice has catalyzed the engine of plausibility in the world of corporate “journalism”. With growing intensity and desperation the corporate propaganda lords have to utilize bold absurdity in the alibi narrative. To their credit, they do it with a pretty steady conviction. We’re not being fooled, however. Not all off us.
Because the industrial powers that be have taken the time to describe, in detail, the engineering of atmospheric spraying, they’ve actually sounded an alert. If it looks like spray program and manifests as one too, it’s not a reach to conclude that it is what it is; atmospheric spray programing. Now it is seen renewed that all the reported observations and expectations is of a source which industry will not confirm, but some of us must point out. The thread of coherence is easy to trace, as far as I’m concerned. In the process of following the thread, certain notions begin to seem funny. When “science” first informed us of an ozone hole, we were persuaded that the contributing factors of ozone decay was not the jets flying up to, and into the stratosphere, or the rockets punching through it, but rather that it was you and me in our garages using cans of Krylon spray paint. That announcement always seemed odd. Now it seems ridiculous. The ozone tale is like an earlier chapter of the plausible alibi era that has us now getting report after report of progressively greater and greater failure. Desperate failure, in fact, in the attempt to explain the unexplainable, and continue to capitalize on the gullibility of an indoctrinated population that is as apathetic as it is trained. Unfortunately for the corporate creeps that have been intentionally filling the atmosphere with “dust” not everybody is going the compliance with authority route. Too many people are too awake, and with every new distortion report of the unfolding geophysical nightmare more and more people are forced awake. So to all those that would poison the world, and all of us on it, damn you for forcing us into this toxicity corner, and thank for making it so obvious.