How strangely bizarre are the stories of atmospheric and space science becoming? The list of factoids that defies understanding keeps growing and growing. The high-altitude nuclear explosions performed between 1958 and 1962 in the upper layers of the atmosphere is bizarre enough. It’s not like there was a question about the toxicity of the fallout for that at that point. Apparently the practice of detonating A-Bombs in the atmosphere, in the name of “science”, has stopped, but not the experimenting. All the Holes in Heaven projects have the atmosphere full of chemicals and high frequency active auroral research. So in a world in which one would have to be a fool to think that life on earth needs a technological advantage to thrive and survive, I’m thinking that these “scientists” have an unexplained motive. They’re not trying to better know the known atmosphere; they’re pushing the atmosphere’s limits.
What about beyond the atmosphere? The story of the moon race is peculiar. It is full of the kind of failures, setbacks, and question marks that makes the hoax scenario actually sound plausible. The subject of the Van Allen Belts themselves elicits loads of difficult questions. Questions for which, by the way, there are no coherent answers. Then NASA goes ahead and admits that the original footage the moon landings was erased, or taped over. Like what!? Add to that, the idea that NASA also lost the ability to travel to the moon. Lost it!? Excuse me. Lost? Erased? Destroyed? Does that make any sense to anyone? An ultra ambitious national effort is made for a decade, with big resources committed to space travel, and none of it is preserved for posterity. That’s harder to believe than the moon fake conspiracy itself. In my view, right now, there are way more good questions than there are valid answers. The experts on the science of the perimeter of space are hacks, and are much better at baffling their audience than explaining actual physics.
Add up all this twisted science, behavior, and storylines and what do you have? A cover up. Conventional wisdom is that man, with technology, can exit earth. I truly wonder. There are so many details that seem very much to be true, and virtually unknown (at least they were for me). Like the number of satellites in “orbit” being suspended by high altitude balloons. Every drop of rain on earth is contaminated. Atmospheric and ionospheric heaters are in regular use. Now NASA is going to launch three sounding rockets at the sun in the shadow of the moon on April 8th. Another experiment to better understand the atmosphere? With all due respect; I’m not buying it. The culmination of ideas sunk in today with all these incoherencies combined with the official denial of an impenetrable dome in which the terrestrial realm is. This dome is a flat earth and historical theme. Beyond the dome are celestial waters. How about it? The celestial waters probably would not get a second thought if it wasn’t for the pile of bogus crap we’re always being fed by professional scientific experts. Just as well off thinking of everything as fiction right now.
The parasitic class which today inhabit and captain the high finance and industrial combines of earth have been wickedly abusing legions and legions of peoples for millennia are running out of plausible excuses, alibis, and time. Underground might’ve seemed like a good hiding place for a minute, but you can bet that claustrophobia is a neurotics nightmare. That won’t work. They want out. The supremely cowardly drivers of the industrial complexes have violently painted themselves into a corner. They want out. It surely appears as though there is an effort to break out of this terrestrial realm. Something says that the full measure of the hell on earth that the industrial complex fat cats have worked to create is about to swallow them up. One can try bombing your way through the shadow of the moon, but at the end of the day the sun will set, and there will be another formidable layer of rebar and block in the prison of your own device.